Zvi Ryzman Net Worth: Estimated Wealth and How We Verify

Based on available public evidence as of May 2026, Zvi Ryzman's net worth is estimated in the range of $150 million to $300 million, with moderate confidence. Some readers also search for Efraim Grinberg net worth, but this article focuses on Zvi Ryzman’s publicly observable financial signals. That range is built primarily from his decades-long founding ownership stake in American International Industries (AII), a privately held beauty and personal care conglomerate he founded in 1971 and still leads as President and CEO. The absence of a Forbes or Bloomberg listing means there is no single authoritative figure to anchor to, so this estimate is assembled from business ownership inference, nonprofit financial disclosures, and industry context rather than reported earnings.

First, make sure you have the right Zvi Ryzman

The name Zvi Ryzman is not common, but it is worth confirming you are looking at the correct individual before drawing any conclusions about wealth. The Zvi Ryzman relevant to a net-worth discussion is the founder and CEO of American International Industries (also written as A.I.I.), a Los Angeles-based company that serves as an umbrella for a large portfolio of beauty and personal care brands. He founded AII in 1971. Multiple independent sources confirm this identity consistently: NAILS Magazine's industry encyclopedia, Happi's company profile, a Skin Inc. interview from 2012, Touro University's Board of Trustees listings, and ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer entry for Ryzman Foundation Inc, where he is listed as President.

There is also a federal court record on govinfo.gov that references "Zvi Ryzman, Defendant's owner," connecting him to a corporate legal matter as a beneficial owner, which is consistent with his role as founding owner of AII. If you are encountering a different Zvi Ryzman in a different industry or geography, the AII-Los Angeles-beauty industry combination is your clearest disambiguation filter.

What "net worth" actually means in a case like this

Net worth is total assets minus total liabilities. For a private business founder like Ryzman, the single biggest asset is almost certainly his ownership stake in AII, which is not traded publicly and therefore has no listed market price. Estimating that stake requires inferring a private company valuation, which is inherently imprecise. Beyond the business equity, assets that would factor into a complete picture include any real estate holdings, personal investment portfolios, cash and liquid assets, and philanthropic vehicles like the Ryzman Foundation. Liabilities, which could include business debt, mortgages, or personal credit lines, are largely invisible without financial disclosures.

For public figures who run private companies and do not file public equity disclosures, sites like this one build estimates by layering together what is observable: nonprofit 990-PF filings, property records, litigation documents, industry revenue benchmarks, and any compensation or transaction data that surfaces in credible reporting. Each layer adds a data point, but the final number is still an estimate with a real margin of error.

The estimated range and what it rests on

The $150 million to $300 million range reflects a few converging signals. AII has operated for over 50 years as an umbrella company for multiple beauty brands. The beauty and personal care sector typically values established multi-brand private companies at anywhere from 1x to 3x annual revenue depending on margins, brand strength, and growth trajectory. Without disclosed revenue figures for AII, the revenue base has to be inferred from industry positioning and brand portfolio size, which introduces significant uncertainty.

The Ryzman Foundation's Form 990-PF for the fiscal year ending November 2016 reported total net assets of $54.5 million, zero liabilities, annual revenue of approximately $6.98 million, and expenses of roughly $793,000. That foundation asset figure alone, now nearly a decade old, represents a meaningful floor on charitable wealth that Ryzman had already transferred out of personal holdings. It also suggests the underlying personal wealth funding those contributions is substantially larger. Foundations are typically funded from personal wealth, not the other way around, which makes the $54.5 million foundation balance a useful but conservative lower-bound signal.

Adding the inferred value of his AII ownership stake to the foundation assets and any personal real estate or investment holdings is what pushes the overall estimate into the $150 million to $300 million range. Confidence is moderate because AII's actual revenue and margins are not public, and Ryzman's personal compensation versus retained equity is also unknown.

Where his money likely comes from

Ryzman's wealth is almost certainly concentrated in a few key sources.

• AII ownership equity: As the founder and continuing CEO of a privately held company with a portfolio spanning multiple beauty brands, his founding equity stake is the primary driver of net worth. If AII were ever sold or recapitalized, this would be the figure that becomes public.
• CEO compensation: As both founder and chief executive, Ryzman would draw a salary and potentially bonuses from AII. Private company executive compensation is not required to be disclosed, so no specific figure is available, but founder-CEO pay at mid-to-large private companies commonly runs in the hundreds of thousands to low millions annually.
• Brand acquisitions and exits: AII's described history of acquiring and growing brands suggests Ryzman may have realized cash from brand sales or licensing arrangements over the years, though no specific transactions have been publicly documented in the sources reviewed.
• Philanthropic foundation assets: The Ryzman Foundation held $54.5 million in net assets as of fiscal year 2016. While foundation assets are legally separate from personal wealth, the size of the foundation signals the scale of the personal wealth that funded it.
• Real estate and personal investments: No specific property records or investment holdings have been surfaced in publicly available sources, but it would be standard for someone at this wealth level to hold California real estate and diversified personal investments.

How to verify this yourself using public records

If you want to check the underlying evidence rather than taking any single site's number at face value, here are the most productive places to look today.

1. ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer: Search for "Ryzman Foundation Inc" at projects.propublica.org/nonprofits. Download the 990-PF filings directly. You can see asset totals, revenue, grants paid, and officer listings for each filing year. The most recently available filings will give you the most current picture of foundation assets.
2. IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (apps.irs.gov/app/eos): Enter "Ryzman Foundation" to confirm the EIN, filing status, and access any publicly available returns. Form 990-PF is a public document by law.
3. California Secretary of State Business Search (bizfileonline.sos.ca.gov): Search for "American International Industries" to pull entity registration records, officer/agent filings, and any status changes that might signal restructuring or ownership shifts.
4. Federal court records via PACER (pacer.gov) or govinfo.gov: Search for "Zvi Ryzman" to locate the federal case document already identified (Case 2:11-cv-05007-RBS). Court filings sometimes contain asset or ownership admissions that are useful for wealth inference.
5. Los Angeles County Assessor property records (assessor.lacounty.gov): Search for property owned by Ryzman to find assessed values on any real estate holdings in LA County.
6. Touro University Board of Trustees page: Confirms his ongoing trustee role and provides an independent institutional affiliation that corroborates identity.
7. NAILS Magazine and Happi industry profiles: Both are publicly accessible and confirm the 1971 founding date, Los Angeles headquarters, and Ryzman's role as CEO, which are useful anchors for cross-referencing any other claims you encounter.

Why estimates vary and what remains genuinely uncertain

The core problem with estimating the net worth of a private company founder is that private company valuations are not observable. AII has never filed a prospectus, registered securities, or gone through a public transaction that would force a market valuation onto the record. Any site that gives you a very precise-sounding figure for Zvi Ryzman's net worth without explaining how they valued AII is filling in a gap with speculation rather than data. If you are also comparing roi shlomo net worth using similar valuation logic, focus on how each source derives its private-company estimate rather than repeating a single precise-sounding number.

The foundation's 990-PF data is the most concrete publicly available financial signal, but it is dated (the most recently verified filing is from 2016), covers only the foundation's assets rather than Ryzman's full personal balance sheet, and does not tell you what has happened in the years since. Beauty industry dynamics, AII's competitive position, any debt or legal liabilities at the company level, and changes in Ryzman's ownership percentage (if he has brought in investors or transferred equity) are all factors that could materially shift the true number in either direction.

There is also the standard limitation of indirect holdings: wealth held through trusts, family LLCs, or holding companies is not always traceable through public filings. Given that Ryzman operates in a closely held business environment, it is reasonable to assume some wealth is held in structures that do not appear in a simple name search.

How his net worth is likely to change over time

The primary variable for Ryzman's net worth going forward is AII's business performance. If the company continues growing its brand portfolio and revenue, the equity value increases even if nothing is publicly reported. The beauty and personal care market is large and reasonably resilient, but it is also competitive, with large strategic acquirers and private equity-backed roll-ups consistently putting pressure on mid-size independent operators. A sale of AII to a strategic buyer or private equity firm would be the single event most likely to produce a verifiable, public net-worth anchor.

The Ryzman Foundation's investment performance also matters. With nearly $55 million in assets as of 2016 and annual investment returns flowing into the foundation, the foundation's current asset base is likely meaningfully higher than that 2016 figure, assuming reasonably typical investment performance. Future 990-PF filings, when they become publicly available, will be the clearest update signal for one major component of the financial picture.

For readers checking back on this topic, the most useful update triggers to watch are: any new 990-PF filings from Ryzman Foundation Inc on ProPublica (typically available 12 to 24 months after a fiscal year end), any news about AII brand acquisitions or divestitures, any California property transactions in public records, and any court filings that reference AII or Ryzman in a financial context. Those four channels are the most likely sources of incremental evidence that would justify revising this estimate.

How this compares to similar private-sector wealth profiles

Ryzman's profile shares structural similarities with other closely held, community-connected business owners whose wealth is documented here. If you are looking for a broader comparison like the yitzhak pastreich net worth question, this kind of range-based, private-company methodology is typically the most reliable way to frame the numbers. You may also see estimates for Avrohom Fruchthandler net worth, which are typically built from similar public-record and valuation inference methods. Like figures such as Shlomo Rechnitz or Avrohom Fruchthandler, Ryzman's financial footprint involves a privately held operating company, philanthropic foundations that surface in 990 filings, and institutional board memberships that provide identity anchors without revealing specific financial figures. In all of these cases, the honest answer to a net-worth question is a range with stated uncertainty rather than a single number, and the methodology matters as much as the figure itself.